Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Jurassic World Film Review

Jurassic World; one of the most anticipated films of the summer, stomped into theatres last weekend and in the words of Samuel L. Jackson, “Hold on to your butts.”  


The film quickly grossed more than any film’s opening weekend ever at $511.8 million beating out 2011’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2.  Although the early reports of success make it seem like a box office smash, does the film stack up to the original?


Jurassic World takes place 22 years after the original film, and the movie pays plenty of homage to the original 1993 Steven Spielberg blockbuster Jurassic Park.  In this reboot, the original park that Richard Attenborough’s character John Hammond dreamed up has finally become a reality.  In fact the park has been around long enough where people are no longer in awe of dinosaurs.  In order to drum up more business and bring people back to the park, the science lab, run by Dr. Henry Wu played by BD Wong (Yes, the same character and actor from the original film), creates a new attraction that's bigger, louder, more cool than any other dinosaur.  By splicing genes of other dinos together with frog and cuttlefish DNA they are able to “invent” a new dinosaur called Indominus Rex.  As we know from previous Jurassic films, that is an awful idea and backfires terribly on the park owner, president, and patrons of Jurassic World.  


The film definitely offers action, suspense, and great dinosaur carnage.  However, is Jurassic World on the same level as the now classic film Jurassic Park?  I would say yes!  Jurassic Park was innovative and gave moviegoers, like myself, something many people wanted to see.  A great thriller with the main attraction, dinosaurs.  I don't think anyone will forget the original scene in Jurassic Park when the T-Rex finally steps out of her paddock and stomps past the SUVs.  So how does Jurassic World give us something moviegoers have never seen?  Plenty of action from dinosaur fight scenes with both old and new dinosaurs.


The other major similarity between Park and World is that both films had a main character that embodied the film.  In Jurassic Park you have the grounded expert Dr. Alan Grant played by Sam Neiil and in Jurassic World you have the ex-military raptor-whisperer Owen played by Chris Pratt.  The two character’s couldn’t be more unlike, however both have a way of becoming the main character of films focused primarily on the CGI created dinosaurs rather than the flesh and blood actors.  Pratt does a great job in this film and is a shining spot amongst the actors.  Two more notable roles from the film are Vincent D’Onofrio’s InGen baddie Hoskins and of course BD Wong reprising his role as Dr. Henry Wu.  Perhaps the role that falls the most flat is Bryce Dallas Howard’s Director of Operations Claire.  Her performance is passable, but not great, especially stacked up against Pratt and the real stars the dinosaurs.  

Getting to see the realization of what John Hammond had intended his park to be prior to the 1993 terror at Isla Nublar was amazing in its own right.  Jurassic World offers us a trip down memory lane but at the same time feels fresh and new, something Jurassic Park: Lost World and Jurassic Park III were unable to do.  With amazing action sequences, plenty of dino terror, and some smart film making, I give Jurassic World 4 out of 5 stars and I am very excited to see where they take this rebooted film series from here.

Thursday, June 11, 2015

San Andreas Film Review

San Andreas shakes its way to the top.

If you are looking for great, mindless destruction this summer you will enjoy San Andreas.  The natural disaster flick pits Ray Gaines, a fire rescue chopper pilot played by The Rock, against the San Andreas fault. Ray races across the state of California to save his family from the mega-quake.  While The Rock continues his string of success and cements himself as an action movie superstar, another actor comes close to stealing the show.  Paul Giamatti plays a Cal Tech Geologist named Lawrence who has spent his life researching earthquakes and is able to predict what will happen next as the mega-quake threatens millions of lives along the California coast. His team of researchers do whatever they can to warn the masses to evacuate the major cities.  Of course those warnings come too late for many people as the quakes rips up L.A. And up the coast to San Fran.

The film has decent acting for an over the top action film.  The Rock is solid as always and even his wife Emma, played by Carla Gugino and daughter Blake, played by Alexandra Daddario turn in passable performances.  Paul Giamatti is where this film gets a lot of the background as he acts as the audience's scientific grounding, reminding us that all of this really could happen and giving some validity to a film that seems ridiculous in some scenes.

Overall I think that if you are looking for a deep plot (this film does have an interesting subplot) and great acting you may want to skip this one. If you are looking for a great disaster film with over the top special effects and mindless destruction than this film is the one for you.  I give this film a 3 out of 5 stars.  

Saturday, May 2, 2015

Avengers: Age of Ultron Review

If you want summer blockbuster fun with tons of superheroes, Avengers: Age of Ultron is the place to find it.  This movie is jam packed with heroes, allies, and foes of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  


The film centers around the Avengers, who have continued the search for Loki's staff from the first film.  It turns out that the staff has been seized by a Hydra scientist who had been experimenting on people to create "enhanced" humans.  (This is Marvels way of getting around the fact that they can't use the word "mutant" due to legal ramifications with Fox studios and the X-Men series) As the team tracks down the staff, Tony Stark, once again played by Robert Downey Jr., has plans to create an artificial intelligence to help keep Earth safe.  Everything backfires when that A.I. he creates, called Ultron and voiced by James Spader, goes haywire and decides the best way to save Earth is to kill humans.  When Ultron teams with a set of "enhanced" twins all chaos ensues for the Avengers.  


As far as superhero movies go, this is an epic storyline that brings together everyone's favorite heroes; Cap, Ironman, Thor, Hulk, Black Widow, & Hawkeye.  However we also see cameos from War Machine, Falcon, Fury, and a few surprises.  With great action, comedy and one liners it is no surprise that the movie is already a hit.  I would argue that the character development makes the film.  Jeremy Renner in the role of Clint Barnes a.k.a. Hawkeye does a great job at establishing some depth for a hero that seems rather mundane in the first film.  At the same time we get to see Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff a.k.a. Black Widow and Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner bring more depth to their characters and a little spice to the team with a budding romance.


The film offers everything you want in a summer blockbuster. Lots of action, great characters, & tons of big name actors.  Being the second in a string of many more Avengers movies to come with a presumably rotating roster of heroes, this film is a great addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  As a fan of Marvel, I can't wait to see what happens next.  Although I must admit I was a bit disappointed that the characters or events of Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Didn't play any role whatsoever in this connected universe.  Like Marvel says, it is all connected!  Because the film doesn't quit deliver the experience of the first film, I give Avengers: Age of Ultron 4 out of 5 stars.  


Sunday, December 28, 2014

Unbreakable Film Review

The Louis Zamperini biopic comes up big in theaters with inspiration.  


The latest biopic to hit theaters does not fall short in amazement and wonder.  In this inspirational true story, Loius Zamperini goes from adolescent trouble maker to local track star turned Olympian.  All of this nestled nicely in as flashbacks during his missions on board a B-17 Flying Fortress in World War II.  The pure survival instinct and mentality of Louis is the lifeblood of this film.  After going out on a search and rescue mission, his plane crashes in the Pacific and he spends over a month lost at sea with two other survivors.  Finally the survivors are rescued, unfortunately by a Japanese warship.  Louis spend the rest of World War II as a prisoner of war in Japan.  The tests and ordeals that Louis goes through are astonishing.  The film does a great job of showing us what Louis went through while providing a glimpse into the life of a POW in World War II.  


Much of the film can be credited to director Angelina Jolie doing a great job in just her third directorial venture.  She was also pivotal in getting the film made at all.  However the little known cast is what carries this film.  Jack O'Connell, who played Louis, does a great job of portraying the raw emotion of the events in Louis' life.  From being marooned in the ocean to standing up for himself in prison camp, O'Connell definitely has the acting chops to parlay this role into many more lead roles as well as awards for his portrayal of Zamperini.  The other pivotal role in the film was Zamperini's rival, Japanese officer Wantanabe played by Takamasa Ishihara.  Takamasa does a great job of portraying the cold Watanabe, nicknamed "the Bird" by the prisoners.  The Bird becomes not just a rival to Zamperini, but through Takamasa's masterful acting job he becomes a symbol of oppression over the prisoners which must eventually be overcome by Louis.  

With great acting, directing, and an inspirational, albeit extraordinary, true story at the heart of this film, Unbroken is a very well-done film.  I have no doubt that this film will win many awards in the upcoming award season.  I also believe this is a good inspirational film for anyone to see.  I give Unbroken 3.5 out of 4 stars.  

Saturday, November 22, 2014

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 Film Review

With a star studded cast, part one of the third installment of The Hunger Games trilogy lives up to the hype.


When we last saw Jennifer Lawrence on screen as the teenage heroine Katniss Everdeen, she had just awoken from her rescue after the quarter-quell arena chaos.  Katniss quickly found out, as our second film Catching Fire draws to a close, that district 12, her home, was firebombed by the Capital. Now, she is en route to the fabled district 13 which was thought to have been destroyed by the Capital 75 years ago.  Mockingjay part 1 picks up right where our story left off.  Katniss is on the mend and has been reunited in district 13 with her family and friends from district 12.  Soon our heroine is swept up into the revolution by the man who designed the quarter-quell games and engineered her escape, Plutarch Heavensbee played by the late Philip Seymour Hoffman and the President of district 13 Alma Coin played by Julianne Moore.  Coin and Heavensbee are hatching a plan to use Katniss, or rather the “girl on fire”, as the face of the revolution.  After some convincing, Katniss agrees to help in order to end the tyranny of the maniacal President Snow played by Donald Sutherland. As Katniss begins filming promos and propaganda for the revolution, skipping from war zones to hospitals acting like a sort of USO celebrity meant to unite the troops, we begin to see the real destruction being done on the front.  As the rebels begin airing her promos on TV we get a peek at the face of the Capital, Peeta Mellark played by Josh Hutcherson.  Peeta, now brainwashed perhaps, and Katniss end up facing off over the airwaves in a propaganda-style war-of-words that would make any politician alive today blush.  The revolution continues to rage on and become more personal than ever for Katniss as we go on this emotional voyage with the girl on fire.

As someone who has read the entire series of books, and enjoyed the first two films, I wasn't sure if I would like this newest addition to the series.  Nearly everyone I have discussed the book series with views Mockingjay as the weakest of the trilogy.  It has always seemed to me that Suzanne Collins wrote a great couple of novels and then her publisher wanted a third book so she tacked Mockingjay onto the series to make a trilogy.  Adding to that, I also wasn't happy that Lionsgate decided to split this book into two films.  Although I was a bit pessimistic about this film going in, I think Mockingjay was well done.  This series has really done a great job of taking a young adult (YA) novel series and adding in great acting.  By casting the young talent of Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, & Liam Hemsworth and combining them with Woody Harrleson, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Donald Sutherland, Elizabeth Banks, Julianne Moore, and of course Stanley Tucci, the acting is excellent in this film.  Each actor provides the depth needed for their character and even allow the audience a few laughs in this film with such incredibly intense subject matter.  

With good source material, a well written screen adaptation of that material, excellent acting, and of course likable (or hateable) characters, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 offers up everything we have come to expect and love about this series.  I give this film a 4 out of 5 stars.  Make sure to watch the first two films before seeing Mockingjay.  If you do that, you will  definitely enjoy this well made dystopian series.  If you get really ambitious, you should read the books as well.  They are a quick read and very difficult to put down. Enjoy!

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Interstellar Review

Matthew McConaughey scored big with last year's film Dallas Buyers Club, but can he back up that Oscar winning performance with another masterful one? The short answer is, yes.


In the new film Interstellar, McConaughey plays Cooper, a former engineer and pilot for NASA who has been forced, along with much of the world, to resort to farming.  In this Malthusian-like bleak future, the Earth has run out of resources and the food supply has dwindled due to major blights affecting crops world wide.  Populations have plummeted and we come to find out that the Earth is dying. In order to save human kind NASA has secretly been conducting a mission to find a new home planet suitable for humans.  Aiding this search was the discovery of a worm hole near Saturn that someone or something placed there to help save the human race. McConaughey faces the terribly difficult decision to either stay with his children on our dying planet and wait for death or leave his family behind, perhaps never seeing them again, in hopes of  discovering a new planet for his family and mankind.  Ultimately for the good of his family he chooses to search for the new planet.  He and his crew, which includes Anne Hathaway as Brand and Wes Bentley as Doyle, head through the wormhole and into deep space in hopes of saving humankind.  

This film is done brilliantly with a well written story by writer and director Christopher Nolan as well as great acting from McConaughey, Hathaway, and Jessica Chastain as McConaughey's grown up daughter Murph.  Although it is possible this film won't receive the same buzz and award season recognition as other films due to its sci-fi nature, McConaughey's role playing a father and the emotions he went through from leaving his kids behind to the heartbreaking scene of him watching them grow up via space transmission evoked major emotions on screen and with the audience.  McConaughey's portrayal of Cooper leaves me no doubt that he is one of the best actors in Hollywood today.   In addition to McConaughey, this star studded cast does an amazing job of acting.  With such big names as John Lithgow, Michael Caine, and Matt Damon, the film has plenty of big name acting talent and it shows through on screen.  

Although the film has a rather bleak outlook of our possible future on Earth, the tag line of the movie does indeed offer a glimmer of hope.  "Mankind was born on Earth, it was never meant to die here." Indeed we will find a way to endure.  The message of this film resonates at a time when we face major issues across the globe and many people foresee widespread food and resource shortages in our future.  This well written story hits close to home while being an original story at a time when reboots and sequels dominate the box office.  I give this film a resounding 5 out of 5 stars and recommend you see this film with some Kleenex if you are a parent.

Friday, October 17, 2014

"Fury" Review

The gritty World War II film "Fury" sets its sights on a poor box office.  


A few words can sum up the new Brad Pitt World War II film "Fury":  gritty, realistic, and raw.  The film is set in April of 1945.  The Allies have the Nazis on the run and as a last ditch effort to stave off defeat, Hitler has decreed "total war", demanding every man, woman, and child take up arms in defense of the homeland.  The film also sets the stage by letting the audience know that American tanks are out gunned and lack the armor that the more advanced German Panzer and Tiger tanks posess.  Enter the grizzled tank crew of Sergeant Don "Wardaddy" Collier played by Brad Pitt.  We quickly learn that this band of rag tag fighters have been together since the beginning of the war, as Sergeant Collier so eloquently stated,"I started this war killing Germans in Africa...Now I'm killing Germans in Germany."  The film also does a great job of adding details and building the characters' war backgrounds through stories and meaningful dialog between each other.  


The real strength of this film is the extreme realism of the characters, their interactions, and the major theme this film focuses on.  Where many war films paint war in a heroic, almost romantic light, this film focuses on the realities of warfare.  The exchange between tank gunner Boyd "Bible" Swan played by Shia LaBeouf and replacement driver Norman Ellison sums up the theme of the film, "Wait till you see what one man can do to another."  This theme stays evident from one scene to the next. Death is everywhere in this film, from the raw battle scenes to the German civilians that have become casualties of total war.  Director and writer David Ayer does a great job of showing us the realism of warfare.  No character is without flaws and the audience gets the feeling that by cheating death, "by the grace of God", that their grace may be running out.  

"Fury" features great acting by Pitt, LaBeouf and company, along with an excellent storyline and great war action.  This gritty and raw movie has plenty of battle action while setting the stage of this bleek war, and maintaining its overarching theme showcasing the horrors of man in war. If you are a fan of "Saving Private Ryan" or "Band of Brothers" like I am, you will enjoy the storytelling and legitimacy of this film.  Although be warned, this movie is very realistic and depicts the horrors of warfare. I give Fury 5 out of 5 stars.